Architecture & code
Review boundaries, interfaces, data flow, dependencies, readability, error handling, and maintainability.
Technical project guidance
Mentor review for architecture, repositories, testing, evaluation, reproducibility, deployment, and the limitations a student must be able to explain.
The purpose
A convincing software or AI capstone needs a clear problem, traceable requirements, maintainable implementation, meaningful evaluation, and honest limitations. The planned StudyLabX workflow uses checkpoints to review the student's own repository and reasoning without taking control of the submission.
Review lenses
Review boundaries, interfaces, data flow, dependencies, readability, error handling, and maintainability.
Match important claims to test cases, baselines, metrics, representative data, and reproducible results.
Identify security, privacy, performance, cost, reliability, and operational constraints before the demo.
What guidance can cover
Guidance may include architecture critique, debugging strategy, repository review, test design, model-evaluation planning, data-leakage checks, reproducibility, deployment readiness, and documentation feedback. Examples may illustrate a technique, but the student's assessed implementation and explanation remain their responsibility.
For AI projects, a polished interface does not replace evidence. Review therefore emphasizes data provenance, baseline comparison, metric choice, failure cases, model limitations, repeatability, and the difference between prototype behaviour and supported claims.
Related support